Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patterns II (game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. discussion to merge should take place at talk page –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Patterns II (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A non-notable game that appeared as one game in a book of games. Stephen 23:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- *Note: Splitting game from a bundled discussion. Tavix (talk) 00:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with A Gamut of Games —Preceding unsigned comment added by Empire3131 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I'm assuming that the paper sources contain non-trivial mention of this game, unless somebody claims otherwise. In this case Patterns II is notable enough to stand on its own. TotientDragooned (talk) 05:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep assuming the sources are non-trivial. Scaldi (talk) 22:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please note that the references refer to the generic game Patterns rather than this non-notable variant. The online reference is broken. --Stephen 09:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll note no such thing. I have Mathematical Circus beside the keyboard as I write, and it most definitely documents this paper-and-pencil game, not Patterns the card game, on pages 46 to 52. And the McCoy citation was easy to fix. It simply required the willingness to do so and a little imagination in looking for the new URL. Uncle G (talk) 14:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.