Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Mathew Malayil
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Gregory Mathew Malayil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable teacher. Can't find any independent source. Greek Legend (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - hard to see that he meets WP:NACADEMIC or the WP:GNG and there are few if any external sources that I can find. JMWt (talk) 09:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete nothing coming close to indicate he meets the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - agree with nominator's summary and the comments so far. The references used in the article are generic pages for institutions and organisations, they make no mention of this individual. I added his profile page a the DVK site as a reference, but there is a lack of independent coverage. Drchriswilliams (talk) 09:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.