Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Merseyside
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted 03:11, 14 December 2007.
I believe this list fulfils the criteria as well as being consistent with the five other featured lists covering different areas. Self nomination. Thanks Suicidalhamster 20:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Sefton Coast in currently a useless redirect, if that could be fixed, it'd be a good thing. I'd personally like something that made the intro more than a cute-and-paste job. Maybe mention where is Merseyside (not everybody is British), and possible about the relevant (if any) geographical/geological or ecological peculiarities of this Area of Search? Circeus 05:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sefton Coast is now a stub. I have also added some information on Merseyside and some of its characteristics (very basic at the moment). Do you think more should be added? Suicidalhamster 16:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- The extra context is a greater improvement than it might look. Support. Circeus 18:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sefton Coast is now a stub. I have also added some information on Merseyside and some of its characteristics (very basic at the moment). Do you think more should be added? Suicidalhamster 16:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support with a minor issue - you have capitalization issues in the header of the table. A really minor thing, but... "Site name" "Grid reference" vs "Reason for Designation" "Biological Interest". Choose one or the other? Otherwise I agree with Circeus - the expanded lede is great and the list looks good. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 06:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have changed the header to lower case for the second words. Thanks for spotting that. Suicidalhamster (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Fixed a typo in Lead. Other than that, looks good. Woody (talk) 16:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Support Very thorough, good job, I especially like the use of
in the table. Overall good job!
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 19:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.